Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Underwater Discoveries results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 2,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,100 of 16,562 topics). This Underwater Discoveries is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Underwater Discoveries
Topic details
Total words: 2,444
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.6%4.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.6%3.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos