Speaker summary
67%3 analyzed articles/videos246.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Zandi results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Overconfidence Bias, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 391.028 faulty-reasoning hits from 246.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 14% and a BS Rank of 21% (22,653 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Zandi is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
Mark Zandi
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 246.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

20% percentile
025507510020.1% percentile
14.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos246.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.3%11.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate