Speaker summary
⁠70%2 analyzed articles/videos259 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Roberts results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Actor-Observer Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 56.9% saturation with 255 hits. Analysis detected 567.13 faulty-reasoning hits from 259 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (22,955 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Roberts is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Mark Roberts
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 259
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.1% percentile
13.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos259 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 56.9%56.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 8.9%8.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 13.2%13.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 56.9%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.6%Indoctrination: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Straw Man: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos