Speaker summary
⁠35%2 analyzed articles/videos70.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Milley results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 56.1% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 370 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 35% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,142 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Milley is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Mark Milley
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 70.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
35.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos70.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 56.1%56.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 39.4%39.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 39.4%39.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 39.4%39.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 39.4%39.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 39.4%39.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.6%13.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 56.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 39.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 39.4%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 39.4%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 39.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 39.4%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos