Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video1,065 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Leary results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), False Dilemma, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 154.302 hits. Analysis detected 851.443 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,065 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (28,065 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Leary is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group.
Mark Leary
Speaker details
Total words: 1,065
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751001.1% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.0%1.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 8.5%8.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.3%7.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.1%No True Scotsman: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos