Speaker summary
84% 2 analyzed articles/videos 383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Fairhurst results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Ad Hominem , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 49.9% saturation with 190.974 hits . Analysis detected 1,036.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 383 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.4% and a BS Rank of 17% (23,614 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Fairhurst is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group. Mark Fairhurst
Speaker details
Total words: 383
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.7% percentile 12.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos383 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 49.9% 49.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 22.3% 22.3% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Speaker 19.9% 19.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 19.6% 19.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 33.1% 33.1% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 15.6% 15.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 19.2% 19.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 49.9%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 33.1%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 1.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 2.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 6.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst