Speaker summary
⁠56%4 analyzed articles/videos816.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Cuban results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 319 hits. Analysis detected 2,505.24 faulty-reasoning hits from 816.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (27,312 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Cuban is better (less manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group.
Mark Cuban
Speaker details
Total words: 816.667
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751003.7% percentile
5.9% BS Score4 analyzed videos816.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 26.4%26.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.0%5.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 14.4%14.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos