Speaker summary
51% 2 analyzed articles/videos 264 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marcela Rodriguez results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 92 hits . Analysis detected 637.056 faulty-reasoning hits from 264 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,009 of 28,364 speakers). This Marcela Rodriguez is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Marcela Rodriguez
Speaker details
Total words: 264
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.8% percentile 10.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos264 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 23.2% 23.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 18.4% 18.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 14.8% 14.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 14.0% 14.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 15.7% 15.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 14.1% 14.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 26.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 0.8% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 7.5% Slippery Slope: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst