Speaker summary
40% 3 analyzed articles/videos 284 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manning results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Optimism Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 62 hits . Analysis detected 436.209 faulty-reasoning hits from 284 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 4% (25,241 of 26,155 speakers). This Manning is better (less manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group. Manning
Speaker details
Total words: 284
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.5% percentile 5.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos284 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 12.0% 12.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.4% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst