Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Machado results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias and Hasty Generalization, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 59.6% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 118 faulty-reasoning hits from 109 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,647 of 27,777 speakers). This Machado is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Machado
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠55%Machado (selected)37%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 109
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.5% percentile
36.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos109 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 59.6%59.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.8%13.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 59.6%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos