Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video91.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Sorin results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, False Dilemma, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 52.5% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 154 faulty-reasoning hits from 91.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,683 of 28,364 speakers). This Lisa Sorin is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Lisa Sorin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 91.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510048.2% percentile
30.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos91.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 52.5%52.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 26.2%26.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 26.2%26.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 23.8%23.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 52.5%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 6.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos