Speaker summary
⁠32%4 analyzed articles/videos230.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsay Clancy results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 258 faulty-reasoning hits from 230.5 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (24,765 of 26,849 speakers). This Lindsay Clancy is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group.
Lindsay Clancy
Speaker details
Total words: 230.5
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751007.8% percentile
8.3% BS Score4 analyzed videos230.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.5%8.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 9.5%9.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos