Author summary
37% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,336 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shelley Murphy results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 752 hits . Analysis detected 4,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,008 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,670 of 6,630 authors). This Shelley Murphy is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group. Shelley Murphy
Author details
Total words: 7,008
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst