Author summary
29%3 analyzed articles/videos2,235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abby Patkin results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 1,290 hits. Analysis detected 7,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,828 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,531 of 6,202 authors). This Abby Patkin is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Abby Patkin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
44%Abby Patkin (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,828
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

43% percentile
025507510043.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.4%8.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.6%14.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate