Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video103.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liberty Avila results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Loss Aversion, and Unattributed Quote, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 276 faulty-reasoning hits from 103.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,344 of 28,364 speakers). This Liberty Avila is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Liberty Avila
Speaker details
Total words: 103.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.4% percentile
31.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos103.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 40.6%40.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 29.7%29.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 29.7%29.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.7%29.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 40.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos