Speaker summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos315 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Lichter results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 42.4% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 147.068 faulty-reasoning hits from 315 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,310 of 28,364 speakers). This Laura Lichter is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Laura Lichter
Speaker details
Total words: 315
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510031.9% percentile
19.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos315 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 42.4%42.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 42.4%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos