Speaker summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video188 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Hobbs results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 220.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 188 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (24,097 of 28,364 speakers). This Laura Hobbs is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group.
Laura Hobbs
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 188
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

15% percentile
025507510015.0% percentile
11.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos188 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 6.0%Composition/Division: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos