Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Katherine Latham results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 350 hits . Analysis detected 3,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,613 authors). This Katherine Latham is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Katherine Latham
Author details
Total words: 10,052
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst