Speaker summary
36%2 analyzed articles/videos48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These LaTrice McClendon results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 36.1% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 62 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.7% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,655 of 37,438 speakers). This LaTrice McClendon is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
LaTrice McClendon
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
48%LaTrice McClendon (selected)29%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.5% percentile
28.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 36.1%36.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 36.1%36.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 13.9%13.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate