Speaker summary
33% 11 analyzed articles/videos 679.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lance Twiggs results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Hindsight Bias , and Anecdotal , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 83.758 hits . Analysis detected 548.863 faulty-reasoning hits from 679.667 analyzed words across 11 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 2% (28,050 of 28,364 speakers). This Lance Twiggs is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group. Lance Twiggs
Speaker details
Total words: 679.667
Content count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.1% percentile 3.6% BS Score11 analyzed videos679.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 7.5% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst