CBS News17%

Charlie Kirk murder suspect told roommate "he wishes he hadn't done it 11%

7/9/2026, 6:40:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 788 faulty-reasoning hits from 885 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.9% and a BS Rank of 11% (18,913 of 21,172 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the article peer group.

Tyler Robinson, the college student accused of killing conservative activist Charlie Kirk during an event at Utah Valley University in September 2025, acted erratically after the shooting and told his roommate he wished "he hadn't done it," according to an interview played in court Thursday. 
Robinson is charged with aggravated murder and has not entered a plea. 
Prosecutors allege Robinson confessed in a note left for former roommate and romantic partner Lance Twiggs that he "had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I'm going to take it." 
Robinson also allegedly sent a text to Twiggs saying he targeted Kirk because he "had enough of his hatred." 
Twiggs said in a recorded interview with a Utah prosecutor that he saw Robinson the day after the shooting. 
Twiggs told the prosecutor he had never heard Robinson talk about Kirk before the shooting, and when they talked about politics, it usually focused on President Trump and current events. 
Twiggs said that when he saw Robinson on Sept. 12, the day after the shooting, he was walking "around a lot" within their apartment. 
Twiggs said he asked "if what he said was true the night before." 
Robinson "said it was," Twiggs said. 
He "started crying a little bit and said he wishes he hadn't done it," Twiggs said in the interview. 
Robinson then resumed pacing and "doing stuff, I think just to keep himself busy or distracted or something," Twiggs said. 
Twiggs said he left the apartment shortly after because Robinson told him he was going to turn himself in, and he didn't want to be there "regardless of what went down." 
Robinson turned himself in later on Sept. 
12. 
Lance Twiggs, left, the former roommate of Tyler Robinson, speaks to a Utah prosecutor during an interview. 
Twiggs spoke to authorities later that same day, and again on April 20. 
He was given immunity for the statements , meaning what Twiggs said cannot be used against him in a potential criminal case. 
Defense attorneys had fought against the public release of the statements from Twiggs, saying prosecutors would characterize the statements as a confession, undermining Robinson's right to a fair trial if the statements are broadcast by the media. 
Attorneys for the media and for Kirk's widow, Erika, who has attended this week's hearing, had urged the judge to make Twiggs' statements and other evidence public. 
"To not be transparent, to not be open and let the world see what happened will create doubt and distrust in the judicial system," Kirk family lawyer Jeffrey Neiman told Graf Wednesday. 
Neiman filed a request late Wednesday for all evidence against Robinson to be displayed openly and in real time during this week's hearing. 
Neiman wrote that Erika Kirk and Kirk's parents had waited 10 months for the hearing but at times have been denied the chance "to meaningfully observe" it. 
The judge said in response that not all evidence would be openly displayed and he needs to protect the rights of both victims and the defendant. 
There were some redactions in the video played, including when the prosecutor appeared to be showing Twiggs images of the note and messages from Robinson. 
Investigators say Robinson went to a rooftop near where Kirk was speaking and shot him once through the neck as the activist was taking questions from a crowd of several thousand people. 
Kirk was declared dead after being taken to a hospital. 
Investigators found the suspected murder weapon - a bolt-action rifle with one spent round - wrapped in a towel in a wooded area near where Kirk was shot. 
Robinson's attorneys have not commented on his guilt or innocence but have sought to get the death penalty taken off the table, so far unsuccessfully. 
Robinson has sat quietly through the hearing. 
On Thursday, he was dressed in a jacket and tie with one arm shackled to his waist. 
He appeared to be taking notes with his free hand. 
Tyler Robinson, the Utah man accused of fatally shooting Charlie Kirk, listens during a preliminary hearing at the 4th District Court in Provo, Utah, July 9, 2026. 
Spenser Heaps/Pool via Reuters 
Robinson's parents and two of his brothers sat behind him, in the front row of the courtroom gallery. 
Charlie's Kirk parents and Erika Kirk sat a few rows back. 
Sen. 
Mike Lee , a Utah Republican, also was in attendance. 
State District Judge Tony Graf will decide at the conclusion of this week's preliminary hearing if prosecutors have enough evidence to bring Robinson to trial. 
Robinson's lawyers earlier this week questioned the reliability of DNA testing used to link the defendant to the towel and gun. 
A member of Tyler Robinson's defense team interrogated a DNA analyst from the FBI about the techniques she used to connect Robinson to the evidence. 
Defense lawyer Michael Burt cast doubt on the analyst's conclusions. 
"She can't match Mr. 
Robinson to the questioned samples," Burt argued. 
But forensics expert Lawrence Quarino said law enforcement agencies use "extremely reliable" tests to determine the probability that a person matches with DNA found at a crime scene. 
DNA testing "is the gold standard in forensic science," said Quarino, a professor and director of the forensic science program at Cedar Crest College in Pennsylvania. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.8%CBS Miami: 2.2%Confirmation Bias7.8%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%CBS Miami: 2.5%Availability Heuristic3.2%This article: 3.4%CBS Miami: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic3.4%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%CBS Miami: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias2.9%This article: 4.2%CBS Miami: 6.0%Framing Effect4.2%This article: 3.1%CBS Miami: 0.3%Loss Aversion3.1%This article: 2.9%CBS Miami: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%CBS Miami: 1.1%Pessimism Bias2.8%This article: 20.6%CBS Miami: 6.7%Negativity Bias20.6%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%CBS Miami: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error2.5%This article: 0.8%CBS Miami: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.8%This article: 1.1%CBS Miami: 0.9%In-Group Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.9%CBS Miami: 4.3%Appeal to Authority8.9%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 3.6%CBS Miami: 0.5%Slippery Slope3.6%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 2.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.2%CBS Miami: 4.1%Appeal to Emotion7.2%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.1%CBS Miami: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.1%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.8%CBS Miami: 2.0%Unattributed Quote1.8%This article: 1.4%CBS Miami: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 5.0%CBS Miami: 1.4%Biased Writer Voice5.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 3.6%CBS Miami: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias3.6%This article: 1.1%CBS Miami: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

885 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers36%attributed speech566writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageLance Twiggs • 19 words • 0.0% coverageLance Twiggs • 30 words • 0.0% coverageLance Twiggs • 24 words • 0.0% coverageLance Twiggs • 13 words • 0.0% coverageLance Twiggs • 6 words • 0.0% coverageLance Twiggs • 19 words • 0.0% coverageLance Twiggs • 20 words • 0.0% coverageLance Twiggs • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJeffrey Neiman • 32 words • 100.0% coverageJeffrey Neiman • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJeffrey Neiman • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Burt • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Burt • 4 words • 100.0% coverageMichael Burt • 7 words • 0.0% coverageLawrence Quarino • 28 words • 0.0% coverageLawrence Quarino • 26 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jeffrey Neiman

72%flagged-word coverage
82 attributed words26% of attributed speech58% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Politically Left Leaning B+39.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jeffrey Neiman: 39.0%39.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.8 ptsWriter: 7.8%Jeffrey Neiman: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.1 ptsWriter: 2.1%Jeffrey Neiman: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.1 ptsWriter: 2.1%Jeffrey Neiman: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Jeffrey Neiman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.