Speaker summary
ā 34%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lam Thuy Vo results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Representativeness Heuristic, with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 42.6% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 23 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.6% and a BS Rank of ā 61% (11,294 of 28,364 speakers). This Lam Thuy Vo is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Lam Thuy Vo
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 61%Lam Thuy Vo (selected)43%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 54
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.2% percentile
42.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos54 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Representativeness Heurisā€¦Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 42.6%42.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 42.6%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos