Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,074 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sisi Wei results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 411 hits. Analysis detected 3,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (2,518 of 6,277 authors). This Sisi Wei is worse (more manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Sisi Wei
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠60%Sisi Wei (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,296
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

60% percentile
025507510059.9% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 7.3%7.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 6.0%6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos