Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,693 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sonya Quick results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,015 hits. Analysis detected 5,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,772 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (2,976 of 6,244 authors). This Sonya Quick is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Sonya Quick
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
53%Sonya Quick (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,772
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

52% percentile
025507510052.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 15.0%15.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.8%5.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.8%5.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Author 15.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos