Speaker summary
⁠33%5 analyzed articles/videos48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KTVU results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 92 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (20,085 of 28,364 speakers). This KTVU is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
KTVU
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510029.2% percentile
18.5% BS Score5 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 21.7%21.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 16.9%16.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos