Author summary
87% 1 analyzed article/video 1,087 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marlo De La Mora results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 47.7% saturation with 2,075 hits . Analysis detected 5,625 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,458 of 6,628 authors). This Marlo De La Mora is worse (more manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group. Marlo De La Mora
Author details
Total words: 4,348
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.0% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 47.7% 47.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.2% 18.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.5% 16.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Halo Effect: Author 47.7%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst