Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video337 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kimberly McFann results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 405.668 faulty-reasoning hits from 337 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (25,235 of 28,364 speakers). This Kimberly McFann is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Kimberly McFann
Speaker details
Total words: 337
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510011.0% percentile
9.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos337 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 22.8%22.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 25.3%25.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos