Speaker summary
80% 2 analyzed articles/videos 387.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kim Tavaglione results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Slippery Slope , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 124 hits . Analysis detected 851.949 faulty-reasoning hits from 387.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (24,152 of 28,364 speakers). This Kim Tavaglione is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group. Kim Tavaglione
Speaker details
Total words: 387.5
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.9% percentile 11.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos387.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 21.8% 21.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 20.0% 20.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 29.5% 29.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 19.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.6% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst