Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video38 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kim "Katie" USA results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 37.8% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 185.673 faulty-reasoning hits from 38 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,068 of 28,364 speakers). This Kim "Katie" USA is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Kim "Katie" USA
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠54%Kim "Katie" USA (selected)36%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 38
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.9% percentile
35.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos38 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 67.6%67.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 60.0%60.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 60.0%60.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 37.8%37.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 28.1%28.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 28.1%28.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.1%28.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 14.6%14.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 67.6%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 60.0%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 60.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 37.8%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos