Woman Pulled From Car During Delaware Traffic Stop After Allegedly Refusing Officer’s Orders 25%

By Jennifer55%

7/9/2026, 3:33:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 895 faulty-reasoning hits from 607 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.1% and a BS Rank of 25% (16,564 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the article peer group.

A video of a woman’s alleged encounter with a Delaware State Police trooper in Dover is going viral online, and despite how forceful the officer appears to become, many people in the comments aren’t siding with the woman. 
In the clip, the trooper has the woman’s vehicle pulled over while a man, who appears to be with her, is already standing outside the car. 
The woman appears to have been instructed to step out of the vehicle, but when she allegedly refuses to comply, the trooper begins to apply some force. 
The officer can be seen pulling at the woman’s legs before eventually getting her out of the vehicle. 
He then appears to force her to the ground, but the tussling doesn’t end there. 
Meanwhile, the man who appears to be with her continues to stand beside the car, watching this all play out. 
A child can also be seen at the rear of the vehicle, putting his head down on the trunk while officers continue detaining the woman. 
A woman in Dover, Delaware refused to comply with troopers, got violent, and had to be pulled out of her car and forcibly arrested. 
Her family is now fundraising on GoFundMe to cover her fees. 
This is what happens when crime is rewarded instead of punished. pic.twitter.com/TC833BBHl9 
- Kim "Katie" USA (@KimKatieUSA) July 9, 2026 
More Officers Arrive After the Woman is Pulled From the Car 
What appears to have started as a routine traffic stop quickly turns into a much larger scene after the woman allegedly refuses to exit the vehicle. 
Not only are multiple people who appear to be traveling with her standing outside the car at this point, but shortly after she is pulled out, several more state troopers arrive at the scene. 
Bystanders can also be seen gathering around, watching as everything unfolds. 
The woman remains on the ground as at least two officers surround her. 
The clip of the encounter was reshared by X user @KimKatieUSA, who claimed the woman later launched a GoFundMe to “cover her fees.” 
The user added, “This is what happens when crime is rewarded instead of punished,” making it clear they weren’t on the woman’s side. 
The X user also shared what appears to be a screenshot of the woman’s GoFundMe, titled “Help Bring a Mother Home to Her Four Children,” with a fundraising goal of $4,500. 
She was arrested for resisting arrest. 
It cost the city less to let her go. 
- The Black Tucker Carlson Jr ?? 
(@B1TuckerCarlson) July 9, 2026 
In the comments under the clip, a debate took place, with some questioning the stop and others the fundraiser. 
“Beyond GoFundMe she will sue for excessive force,” one person claimed. 
Another wrote, “Why do people continue to resist arrest in America and actually expect not to get the shit beaten out of them?” 
Someone else questioned why people would donate at all, saying they wouldn’t give anything because the woman should have simply gotten out of the car. 
But one person did offer a different perspective, writing, “She was arrested for resisting arrest. 
It cost the city less to let her go.” 
The Daily Dot was unable to independently verify the circumstances that led to the traffic stop or the claims made by social media users about the incident. 
Sign up to receive the Daily Dot’s Internet Insider newsletter for urgent news from the frontline of online. 
The post Woman Pulled From Car During Delaware Traffic Stop After Allegedly Refusing Officer’s Orders, Internet Is Divided appeared first on The Daily Dot . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.8%Jennifer: 5.4%dailydot.com: 4.3%Confirmation Bias3.8%This article: 1.0%Jennifer: 0.6%dailydot.com: 0.9%Anchoring Bias1.0%This article: 9.9%Jennifer: 4.8%dailydot.com: 4.2%Availability Heuristic9.9%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.4%dailydot.com: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 1.4%dailydot.com: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 2.0%dailydot.com: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.8%Jennifer: 4.5%dailydot.com: 4.9%Framing Effect14.8%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Jennifer: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect1.5%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.6%dailydot.com: 1.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Jennifer: 1.4%dailydot.com: 1.4%Pessimism Bias3.5%This article: 22.6%Jennifer: 9.7%dailydot.com: 8.7%Negativity Bias22.6%This article: 3.8%Jennifer: 0.8%dailydot.com: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias3.8%This article: 8.1%Jennifer: 3.9%dailydot.com: 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error8.1%This article: 3.3%Jennifer: 0.7%dailydot.com: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.8%dailydot.com: 1.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.5%dailydot.com: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 2.6%dailydot.com: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.8%Jennifer: 0.8%dailydot.com: 0.7%Recency Bias1.8%This article: 3.1%Jennifer: 0.9%dailydot.com: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 1.7%dailydot.com: 1.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 2.8%dailydot.com: 1.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 4.1%Jennifer: 2.8%dailydot.com: 2.2%False Dilemma4.1%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.6%dailydot.com: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.8%Jennifer: 8.8%dailydot.com: 8.9%Hasty Generalization5.8%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 3.0%dailydot.com: 2.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.9%Jennifer: 8.7%dailydot.com: 7.1%Appeal to Emotion7.9%This article: 4.0%Jennifer: 1.0%dailydot.com: 0.9%Begging the Question4.0%This article: 11.7%Jennifer: 1.9%dailydot.com: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.7%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.5%dailydot.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.1%Jennifer: 2.4%dailydot.com: 1.9%Burden of Proof5.1%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.5%dailydot.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.1%Jennifer: 6.1%dailydot.com: 7.4%Anecdotal8.1%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.1%Jennifer: 2.4%dailydot.com: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.1%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.8%Jennifer: 6.7%dailydot.com: 5.1%Unattributed Quote3.8%This article: 2.0%Jennifer: 3.7%dailydot.com: 3.4%Quote-first Misdirection2.0%This article: 9.9%Jennifer: 4.7%dailydot.com: 4.0%Biased Writer Voice9.9%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 2.1%dailydot.com: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jennifer: 0.5%dailydot.com: 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Jennifer: 1.2%dailydot.com: 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.0%

607 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers19%attributed speech491writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageKim "Katie" USA • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageKim "Katie" USA • 23 words • 100.0% coverageKim "Katie" USA • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageThe Black Tucker Carlson Jr ?? • 7 words • 0.0% coverageThe Black Tucker Carlson Jr ?? • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDaily Dot • 18 words • 100.0% coverageThe Daily Dot • 25 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kim "Katie" USA

87%flagged-word coverage
62 attributed words53% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice+29.6 ptsWriter: 7.5%Kim "Katie" USA: 37.1%37.1%Unattributed Quote-4.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%Kim "Katie" USA: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.4 ptsWriter: 2.4%Kim "Katie" USA: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.