Speaker summary
⁠66%2 analyzed articles/videos67.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kim Driscoll results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Halo Effect, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 51.7% saturation with 47.326 hits. Analysis detected 167.326 faulty-reasoning hits from 67.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,253 of 28,364 speakers). This Kim Driscoll is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Kim Driscoll
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 67.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.2% percentile
28.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos67.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 52.5%52.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 51.7%51.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.7%14.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.3%13.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 52.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 51.7%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 6.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos