Author summary
69% 1 analyzed article/video 634 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bianca Garcia results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Quote-first Misdirection , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 483 hits . Analysis detected 1,658 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,902 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,830 of 6,629 authors). This Bianca Garcia is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group. Bianca Garcia
Author details
Total words: 1,902
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.4% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 25.4% 25.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.2% 6.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 25.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Composition/Division: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst