Speaker summary
⁠51%5 analyzed articles/videos423 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kim Alexander results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 1,001.441 faulty-reasoning hits from 423 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (26,941 of 28,364 speakers). This Kim Alexander is better (less manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group.
Kim Alexander
Speaker details
Total words: 423
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751005.0% percentile
6.7% BS Score5 analyzed videos423 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.5%11.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.1%12.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos