Speaker summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Khrishon Smith results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, In-Group Bias, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 104 faulty-reasoning hits from 190 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (24,988 of 28,364 speakers). This Khrishon Smith is better (less manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group.
Khrishon Smith
Speaker details
Total words: 190
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510011.9% percentile
10.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos190 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 18.9%18.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Anecdotal: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos