Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video67 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keith Hinkley results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 50.25 hits. Analysis detected 124.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 67 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,399 of 28,364 speakers). This Keith Hinkley is worse (more manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group.
Keith Hinkley
Speaker details
Total words: 67
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510052.8% percentile
34.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos67 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 38.3%38.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 11.7%11.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 38.3%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos