Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Degelau-Pierce results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 36.8% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 282.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,733 of 28,364 speakers). This Kate Degelau-Pierce is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Kate Degelau-Pierce
Speaker details
Total words: 108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.5% percentile
27.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos108 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 36.8%36.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 48.3%48.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 26.4%26.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.1%36.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 13.9%13.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 48.3%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos