Speaker summary
⁠55%3 analyzed articles/videos306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kat Cammack results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Indoctrination, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 251 hits. Analysis detected 1,452.614 faulty-reasoning hits from 306 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (23,393 of 28,364 speakers). This Kat Cammack is better (less manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Kat Cammack
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 306
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510017.5% percentile
12.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos306 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 33.6%33.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 38.7%38.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 26.4%26.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 17.5%17.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 9.6%9.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.6%9.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 38.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos