Speaker summary
⁠42%2 analyzed articles/videos155.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karen Goh results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 46.4% saturation with 99.035 hits. Analysis detected 190.035 faulty-reasoning hits from 155.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,923 of 28,364 speakers). This Karen Goh is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Karen Goh
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 155.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510033.3% percentile
20.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos155.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 46.4%46.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 16.0%16.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Speaker 46.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos