Speaker summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Elicker results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 45 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,890 of 28,364 speakers). This Justin Elicker is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Justin Elicker
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.5% percentile
25.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.9%28.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos