Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video104.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Vaughn results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 119.053 faulty-reasoning hits from 104.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,304 of 28,364 speakers). This Julia Vaughn is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
Julia Vaughn
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510021.4% percentile
14.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos104.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 11.1%Middle Ground: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos