Speaker summary
⁠44%2 analyzed articles/videos300.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Gelatt results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Begging the Question, and Blind-Spot Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 567.678 faulty-reasoning hits from 300.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (26,346 of 28,364 speakers). This Julia Gelatt is better (less manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.
Julia Gelatt
Speaker details
Total words: 300.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751007.1% percentile
7.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos300.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.4%10.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 8.5%8.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 1.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 0.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos