Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,797 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Billal Rahman results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 569 hits . Analysis detected 3,660 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,188 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (5,198 of 6,628 authors). This Billal Rahman is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group. Billal Rahman
Author details
Total words: 7,188
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst