Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Adriana Rezal results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 256 hits. Analysis detected 2,855 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,357 authors). This Adriana Rezal is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Adriana Rezal
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Adriana Rezal (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,636
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.0%7.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.3%5.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.6%1.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos