Speaker summary
⁠35%2 analyzed articles/videos82.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Brim-Edwards results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Loss Aversion, with Middle Ground as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 94 faulty-reasoning hits from 82.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,027 of 28,364 speakers). This Julia Brim-Edwards is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Julia Brim-Edwards
Speaker details
Total words: 82.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
22.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos82.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.3%22.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Middle Ground: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 2.5%Middle GroundSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos