Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video34.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joshua Nunez results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 61.5% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,084 of 28,364 speakers). This Joshua Nunez is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Joshua Nunez
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 34.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.9% percentile
35.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos34.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 61.5%61.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 38.5%38.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.8%30.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.8%30.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 61.5%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 38.5%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution ErrorSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos