Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Kesselman results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, False Dilemma, and Indoctrination, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 51.5% saturation with 52.5 hits. Analysis detected 171 faulty-reasoning hits from 102 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,441 of 28,364 speakers). This Josh Kesselman is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Josh Kesselman
Speaker details
Total words: 102
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.7% percentile
41.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos102 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 51.5%51.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 38.2%38.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 39.7%39.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Slippery Slope: Speaker 51.5%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos