Speaker summary
⁠65%4 analyzed articles/videos526.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Hoover results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 160.191 hits. Analysis detected 1,116.005 faulty-reasoning hits from 526.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (26,068 of 28,364 speakers). This Josh Hoover is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group.
Josh Hoover
Speaker details
Total words: 526.667
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751008.1% percentile
8.4% BS Score4 analyzed videos526.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Dunning-Kruger EffectSitewide 0.1%Speaker 13.3%13.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.6%8.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 10.8%10.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 24.3%24.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 15.9%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos