Speaker summary
57% 2 analyzed articles/videos 193.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Gulotta results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 34.6% saturation with 122 hits . Analysis detected 1,108.476 faulty-reasoning hits from 193.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (19,136 of 28,364 speakers). This Joseph Gulotta is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group. Joseph Gulotta
Speaker details
Total words: 193.667
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.5% percentile 20.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos193.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 46.3% 46.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 34.0% 34.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 32.3% 32.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 30.3% 30.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 21.0% 21.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 34.6% 34.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 23.8% 23.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 20.3% 20.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 46.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.6%, sitewide 15.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 32.3%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 4.6% Framing Effect: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst