Speaker summary
⁠51%2 analyzed articles/videos134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Morrison results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Quote-first Misdirection, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 222.055 faulty-reasoning hits from 134 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (20,696 of 26,124 speakers). This Jonathan Morrison is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Jonathan Morrison

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510020.8% percentile
14.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos134 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.7%14.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.6%15.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos