Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Riggins results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, In-Group Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 43.8% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 372.746 faulty-reasoning hits from 163 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,471 of 28,333 speakers). This John Riggins is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
John Riggins
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 163
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510027.7% percentile
17.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos163 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 43.4%43.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 43.8%43.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 14.6%14.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 43.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 43.4%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution ErrorSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos